Tags:
I agree with you. I had a reservation, but pulled out because I just can't justify the mpg versus the size and performance. It seems like SMART should realize that people aren't going to want to sacrifice size AND performance AND price for LESS mpg than you can get on much larger and better performing cars. The Toyota Yaris gets something close to 35+ and is a lot bigger and quicker and is the same or better price.
The IDEA of the SMART car is sound, but one thing has to give - either make it CHEAP, with some of the bells and whistles, and the same mpg; or make it the price it is, (fully loaded), and give better performance and better mpg. A car this size and performance should be getting 60 mpg. It's TINY. People expect it to be better mpg than the Prius.
Personally, if it got 50 mpg and was the top of the line cabriolet model, I would be willing to pay $14,000 tops. If it got 35-40 mpg I would spend $12,000 fully loaded. If it were the cheapest model and 50 mpg, I would spend $11,000. Cheapest model at 35-40mpg, $9,000.
Too bad, cuz I really wanted this car, but the mpg and price combo just don't cut it for me - especially since the performance isn't there to justify it. At the very least it should have great performance, but even then, $16k+ for a tiny little car that's just OK on gas? No thanks.
People should look at what their needs are. You read some people putting the Smart down because it is not a 9 passenger min van, or a pickup truck. If you want one of those buy one of those. The Smart concept is very evident and unless one is a misguided sales person for another make posing as a disgrunteled potential buyer, a Smart is what a Smart is. In our case my wife and I currently have 6 cars and 2 motorcycles licenced and insured, and the Smart fufills a need we have.
I am kind of weary of people trying to make the Smart into things that it is not, and then saying "no thanks".
© 2012 Created by izzysmart.
